9-136510809-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.2588-4G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.412 in 1,607,682 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 145,459 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_017617.5 splice_region, intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH1 | NM_017617.5 | c.2588-4G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | ENST00000651671.1 | NP_060087.3 | |||
NOTCH1 | XM_011518717.3 | c.1865-4G>A | splice_region_variant, intron_variant | XP_011517019.2 | ||||
LOC124902310 | XR_007061864.1 | n.508-221C>T | intron_variant | |||||
LOC124902310 | XR_007061865.1 | n.507+830C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.488 AC: 74146AN: 151984Hom.: 19467 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.475 AC: 113692AN: 239218Hom.: 29819 AF XY: 0.459 AC XY: 60308AN XY: 131398
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.404 AC: 587941AN: 1455580Hom.: 125963 Cov.: 62 AF XY: 0.402 AC XY: 291086AN XY: 724460
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.488 AC: 74242AN: 152102Hom.: 19496 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.493 AC XY: 36645AN XY: 74350
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 04, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 05, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 22, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Aortic valve disease 1 Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Adams-Oliver syndrome 5 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Sep 05, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 30, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at