9-2029127-A-G

Position:

• chr9-2029127-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_Strong BP7 BS1_Supporting BS2

The NM_003070.5(SMARCA2):​c.105A>G​(p.Pro35=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000412 in 1,457,548 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: not found (cov: 33)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000041 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: SMARCA2 NM_003070.5 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.305

Genes affected

SMARCA2 (HGNC:11098): (SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a, member 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the SWI/SNF family of proteins and is highly similar to the brahma protein of Drosophila. Members of this family have helicase and ATPase activities and are thought to regulate transcription of certain genes by altering the chromatin structure around those genes. The encoded protein is part of the large ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex SNF/SWI, which is required for transcriptional activation of genes normally repressed by chromatin. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene, which contains a trinucleotide repeat (CAG) length polymorphism. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.67).
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.305 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00000412 (6/1457548) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.000126 (5/39620). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000491. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 5 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
• BS2: High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
SMARCA2	NM_003070.5	c.105A>G	p.Pro35=	synonymous_variant	2/34	ENST00000349721.8
SMARCA2	NM_001289396.1	c.105A>G	p.Pro35=	synonymous_variant	2/34
SMARCA2	NM_139045.4	c.105A>G	p.Pro35=	synonymous_variant	2/33
SMARCA2	NM_001289397.2	c.105A>G	p.Pro35=	synonymous_variant	2/33

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
SMARCA2	ENST00000349721.8	c.105A>G	p.Pro35=	synonymous_variant	2/34	5	NM_003070.5	P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000412 AC: 6 AN: 1457548 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000690 AC XY: 5 AN XY: 724590

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.000126

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Nicolaides-Baraitser syndrome Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.67
CADD	Benign	6.0
DANN	Benign	0.49

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1039400951; hg19: chr9-2029127;