9-21970990-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000077.5(CDKN2A):c.369T>A(p.His123Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000223 in 1,610,194 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H123Y) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000077.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | NM_000077.5 | c.369T>A | p.His123Gln | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000304494.10 | |
CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | c.*13T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000579755.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | ENST00000304494.10 | c.369T>A | p.His123Gln | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000077.5 | P2 | |
CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | c.*13T>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_058195.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00128 AC: 195AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 72AN: 243602Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000203 AC XY: 27AN XY: 132824
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000112 AC: 164AN: 1457860Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000924 AC XY: 67AN XY: 725448
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00128 AC: 195AN: 152334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 90AN XY: 74502
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 20, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 21, 2020 | In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27978560, 25318351, 22885699, 27626068, 18573309, 26601054, 16508961, 26366474, 26342236, 28944238, 26206375, 25186627, 9660926, 9823374, 7882348) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Aug 17, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 01, 2022 | - - |
Melanoma-pancreatic cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Sep 14, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 19, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 23, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 08, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 29, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Sep 04, 2021 | Variant summary: CDKN2A c.369T>A (p.His123Gln) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the Ankyrin repeat-containing domain (IPR020683) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0003 in 243602 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0041 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 14 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDKN2A causing Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma phenotype (0.0003), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.369T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Noonan syndrome/glioneuronal tumors, rectal cancer, and one individual who met health insurance criteria for BRCA1/2 or Lynch syndrome gene testing without a specific phenotype being provided (example, Lin_2016, DeRycke_2017, Yorczyk_2015). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been observed at our laboratory and in the literature (our laboratory, BRCA1 c.2679_2682delGAAA, p.Lys893fsX106; Lin_2016, PTPN11 c.923A>G, p.Asn308Ser), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant as evidenced by similar cell proliferation and viability levels as wild-type CDKN2A (Kwong-Shing Ng_2018). Multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation and a majority consensus leaning towards a likely benign/benign outcome. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Familial melanoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at