9-99128877-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS2
The NM_001407418.1(TGFBR1):c.-88C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR premature start codon gain change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000113 in 1,613,750 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
TGFBR1
NM_001407418.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
NM_001407418.1 5_prime_UTR_premature_start_codon_gain
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.787
Genes affected
TGFBR1 (HGNC:11772): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene forms a heteromeric complex with type II TGF-beta receptors when bound to TGF-beta, transducing the TGF-beta signal from the cell surface to the cytoplasm. The encoded protein is a serine/threonine protein kinase. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Loeys-Dietz aortic aneurysm syndrome (LDAS). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
BP6
Variant 9-99128877-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-99128877-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178135.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=8, Benign=1}. Variant chr9-99128877-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000956 AC: 24AN: 250996Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000111 AC XY: 15AN XY: 135648
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
250996
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
15
AN XY:
135648
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000115 AC: 168AN: 1461590Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000990 AC XY: 72AN XY: 727098
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
168
AN:
1461590
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
72
AN XY:
727098
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74328
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152160
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74328
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 27, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jan 12, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 12, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 17, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | TGFBR1: BP4, BP7 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 01, 2014 | Leu40Leu in exon 2 of TGFBR1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 2/8600 European Amer ican chromosomes and 1/4406 African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequ encing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs201267786). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Nov 06, 2022 | - - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at