ENST00000397002.6:c.*1127T>C

Variant names:

• chr14-24080109-A-G
• rs113119768
• ENST00000397002.6:c.*1127T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_Strong BS1_Supporting

The ENST00000397002.6(NRL):​c.*1127T>C variant causes a splice region change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000965 in 152,310 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.00097 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 (0 hom.)
  • Failed GnomAD Quality Control
• Consequence: NRL ENST00000397002.6 splice_region
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.673

Genes affected

NRL (HGNC:8002): (neural retina leucine zipper) This gene encodes a basic motif-leucine zipper transcription factor of the Maf subfamily. The encoded protein is conserved among vertebrates and is a critical intrinsic regulator of photoceptor development and function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with retinitis pigmentosa and retinal degenerative diseases. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000965 (147/152310) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00141 (96/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00118. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 70 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NRL	NM_001354768.3	c.*1127T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 3	ENST00000561028.6	NP_001341697.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NRL	ENST00000397002.6	c.*1127T>C		splice_region_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1		ENSP00000380197.2
NRL	ENST00000561028	c.*1127T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 3	2	NM_001354768.3	ENSP00000454062.2
NRL	ENST00000397002	c.*1127T>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1		ENSP00000380197.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000972 AC: 148 AN: 152192 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.000145

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00137

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.000288

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00160

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00316

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00141

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00287

GnomAD4 exome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0 AN: 30 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0 AN XY: 16

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000965 AC: 147 AN: 152310 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000940 AC XY: 70 AN XY: 74502

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00137

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.000288

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00160

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00141

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00237

Alfa AF: 0.000847 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.000858

Asia WGS AF: 0.000289 AC: 1 AN: 3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.69
CADD	Benign	12
DANN	Benign	0.89

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113119768; hg19: chr14-24549318;