ENST00000468300.5:c.2025T>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 8P and 8B. PVS1BP6_Very_Strong
The ENST00000468300.5(BRCA1):c.2025T>A(p.Cys675*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000075 in 1,614,188 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. C675C) has been classified as Uncertain significance. Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000468300.5 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
- Fanconi anemia, complementation group SInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
- pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Fanconi anemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000204 AC: 31AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000994 AC: 25AN: 251482 AF XY: 0.0000515 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000616 AC: 90AN: 1461874Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000495 AC XY: 36AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000204 AC: 31AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:3
- -
- -
IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.0000374 -
- -
not provided Benign:4
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24916970, 21990134, 12014998, 28758972, 17924331, 24728327, 15350310, 17308087, 15172985, 12955716, 16528612, 19770520, 20516115, 22753008, 14534301, 17305420, 21447777, 22505045, 21520273, 25637381, 25782689, 23867111, 27272900, 26764160, 26332594, 28781887, 30209399, 30765603, 26689913) -
BRCA1: BP1 -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1Other:1
The p.Cys675X variant in BRCA1 is classified as likely benign because it has been identified in 0.048% (5/10370) of Ashkenazi Jewish and 0.047% (17/35440) of Latino chromosomes by gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). Additionally, variant is present as nonsense variant in 1 of 6 transcripts (not major transcript), while resulting in a missense variant in the remaining 5 transcripts. This variant was classified as Benign on August 10, 2015 by the ClinGen-approved Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) expert panel (Variation ID 55568). ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BS1. -
- -
Ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Low GERP score may suggest that this variant may belong in a lower pathogenicity class -
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The BRCA1 p.Val1804Asp variant was identified in 2 of 1268 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer (Diez 2003), and was also identified in 2 of 2108 control chromosomes (frequency 0.001) from another study (Osorio 2007). This variant was reported in dbSNP (rs80356920) “with untested allele”, in LOVD, and in BIC 14X with unknown clinical importance. The p.Val1804Asp variant was also identified in UMD 6X as a neutral variant, where it was reported to have co-occurred with two different known BRCA1 pathogenic mutations (BRCA1 c.5266dup (p.Gln1756ProfsX74); BRCA1 c.2269delG (p.Val757PhefsX8)), increasing the likelihood that it is benign. The results of functional studies in the literature are somewhat conflicting, though most lean toward neutrality. Ostrow (2004) determined that the variant reduced transcriptional activity in a yeast-based assay, suggesting it may be deleterious; Carvalho (2007) found transcription activity comparable to wild type in yeast but reduced in mammalian cells, suggesting that it may represent a moderate-risk variant; while Lee (2010) found no functional impact of the variant on transcription. Two studies determined that the variant had no impact on protease sensitivity, and no destabilizing effect on the BRCT domain), suggesting that it is neutral (Lee 2010 20516115, Williams 2003 14534301. In addition, histopathology results provide evidence for neutrality, with loss of the variant allele in tumour tissue (Spearman 2008 18824701). Furthermore, the p.Val1804 residue is poorly conserved in mammals and lower organisms; computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; and in silico structural or probability-based models suggest that this is a neutral variant (Capanu 2011, Easton 2007, Lindor 2012, Mirkovic 2004). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at