NM_000038.6:c.3165A>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000038.6(APC):​c.3165A>T​(p.Ile1055Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00423 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0044 ( 18 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.228

Publications

9 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
APC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • desmoid tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial adenomatous polyposis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Turcot syndrome with polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 5-112838759-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112838759-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 132763.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.228 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00276 (421/152336) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00492 (335/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00449. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 180 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 18 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000038.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
APC
NM_000038.6
MANE Select
c.3165A>Tp.Ile1055Ile
synonymous
Exon 16 of 16NP_000029.2
APC
NM_001407446.1
c.3249A>Tp.Ile1083Ile
synonymous
Exon 16 of 16NP_001394375.1
APC
NM_001354896.2
c.3219A>Tp.Ile1073Ile
synonymous
Exon 17 of 17NP_001341825.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
APC
ENST00000257430.9
TSL:5 MANE Select
c.3165A>Tp.Ile1055Ile
synonymous
Exon 16 of 16ENSP00000257430.4
APC
ENST00000508376.6
TSL:1
c.3165A>Tp.Ile1055Ile
synonymous
Exon 17 of 17ENSP00000427089.2
APC
ENST00000502371.3
TSL:1
n.*1363A>T
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 12 of 12ENSP00000484935.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00277
AC:
421
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000772
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00492
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00144
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00304
AC:
763
AN:
250598
AF XY:
0.00303
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000955
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00282
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00197
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00438
AC:
6405
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
18
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00419
AC XY:
3045
AN XY:
727212
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000806
AC:
27
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000894
AC:
40
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
31
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39682
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000522
AC:
45
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00270
AC:
144
AN:
53402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000173
AC:
1
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00523
AC:
5818
AN:
1111992
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00495
AC:
299
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
396
792
1187
1583
1979
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
210
420
630
840
1050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00276
AC:
421
AN:
152336
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00242
AC XY:
180
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000770
AC:
32
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000653
AC:
10
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000288
AC:
1
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00367
AC:
39
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00492
AC:
335
AN:
68028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
3
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19
39
58
78
97
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00420
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00260
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00420
EpiControl
AF:
0.00385

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 22, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 18, 2016
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 12, 2019
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 19, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

not provided Benign:5
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

APC: BP4, BP7, BS2

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Aug 26, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Nov 24, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Dec 12, 2023
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 18, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Sep 11, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 18, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial multiple polyposis syndrome Benign:1
Mar 25, 2015
Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The APC, p.Ile1055Ile variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight COGR through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository, CLINVITAE, COSMIC or MutDB databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61734287 “With Benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001(5 of 5000 in 1000 Genomes Project). In NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) the variant was identified in 34 of 8600 European Americans and 4 of 4405 African Americans. In the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014), the variant was identified in 428 of 120724 chromosomes (frequency: 0.003545) (or 394 of 66424 alleles in the European (Non-Finnish) - 2 of them homozygous, 17 of 6610 alleles in the European (Finnish), 7 of 10258 of Africans, 6 of 11508 Latinos, 4 of 16456 South Asians), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant. The variant was also identified in the Clinvar database and classified as benign by Invitae, by Gene DX and by Ambry genetics; classified as neutral in UMD database and co-occurred with a pathogenic variant - APC: c.1248C>G, p.Tyr416X. It was identified 2X in InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database and 1X in Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database.The p.Ile1055Ile variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign.

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
4.1
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
0.23
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61734287; hg19: chr5-112174456; COSMIC: COSV57352305; API