chr5-112838759-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.3165A>T(p.Ile1055Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00423 in 1,614,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 18 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0044 ( 18 hom. )
Consequence
APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous
NM_000038.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.228
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 5-112838759-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112838759-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 132763.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-112838759-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr5-112838759-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.228 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00276 (421/152336) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00492 (335/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00449. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 180 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 421 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | NM_000038.6 | c.3165A>T | p.Ile1055Ile | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000257430.9 | NP_000029.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.3165A>T | p.Ile1055Ile | synonymous_variant | 16/16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | n.228+9787A>T | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00277 AC: 421AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
421
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00304 AC: 763AN: 250598Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00303 AC XY: 411AN XY: 135438
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
763
AN:
250598
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
411
AN XY:
135438
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00438 AC: 6405AN: 1461822Hom.: 18 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00419 AC XY: 3045AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
6405
AN:
1461822
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3045
AN XY:
727212
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00276 AC: 421AN: 152336Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 180AN XY: 74498
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
421
AN:
152336
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
180
AN XY:
74498
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:9
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 19, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Feb 12, 2019 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 18, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 22, 2020 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | APC: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Sep 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Aug 26, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Dec 12, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 18, 2016 | - - |
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 18, 2024 | This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. - |
Familial multiple polyposis syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Mar 25, 2015 | - - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The APC, p.Ile1055Ile variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight COGR through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository, CLINVITAE, COSMIC or MutDB databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs61734287 “With Benign allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.001(5 of 5000 in 1000 Genomes Project). In NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server) the variant was identified in 34 of 8600 European Americans and 4 of 4405 African Americans. In the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Oct 20th, 2014), the variant was identified in 428 of 120724 chromosomes (frequency: 0.003545) (or 394 of 66424 alleles in the European (Non-Finnish) - 2 of them homozygous, 17 of 6610 alleles in the European (Finnish), 7 of 10258 of Africans, 6 of 11508 Latinos, 4 of 16456 South Asians), increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant. The variant was also identified in the Clinvar database and classified as benign by Invitae, by Gene DX and by Ambry genetics; classified as neutral in UMD database and co-occurred with a pathogenic variant - APC: c.1248C>G, p.Tyr416X. It was identified 2X in InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database and 1X in Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database.The p.Ile1055Ile variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at