NM_000038.6:c.450A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000038.6(APC):​c.450A>G​(p.Lys150Lys) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000231 in 1,608,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00024 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

APC
NM_000038.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.82

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
APC (HGNC:583): (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein that acts as an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway. It is also involved in other processes including cell migration and adhesion, transcriptional activation, and apoptosis. Defects in this gene cause familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), an autosomal dominant pre-malignant disease that usually progresses to malignancy. Mutations in the APC gene have been found to occur in most colorectal cancers, where disease-associated mutations tend to be clustered in a small region designated the mutation cluster region (MCR) and result in a truncated protein product. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2022]
APC Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • desmoid tumor
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial adenomatous polyposis 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • APC-related attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Turcot syndrome with polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 5-112775656-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-112775656-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 181782.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
APCNM_000038.6 linkc.450A>G p.Lys150Lys synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 16 ENST00000257430.9 NP_000029.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
APCENST00000257430.9 linkc.450A>G p.Lys150Lys synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 16 5 NM_000038.6 ENSP00000257430.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000132
AC:
20
AN:
152088
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000157
AC:
39
AN:
247832
AF XY:
0.000120
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000293
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000311
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000241
AC:
351
AN:
1456126
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.000239
AC XY:
173
AN XY:
724136
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000301
AC:
1
AN:
33238
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000677
AC:
3
AN:
44328
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25996
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39484
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000592
AC:
5
AN:
84472
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000375
AC:
2
AN:
53348
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5640
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000297
AC:
329
AN:
1109440
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000183
AC:
11
AN:
60180
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.443
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
15
31
46
62
77
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000131
AC:
20
AN:
152206
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000940
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41564
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5186
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10578
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000294
AC:
20
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.513
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000225
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000102
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Benign:4
Feb 17, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 25, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Jan 30, 2022
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Aug 22, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 01, 2017
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 18, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Aug 29, 2014
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 24, 2019
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

APC-Associated Polyposis Disorders Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The APC p.Lys150Lys variant was identified in 1 of 3082 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0003) from individuals or families being evaluated for FAP (Kerr 2013). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs116020626) “With other allele”, Clinvitae database (with conflicting interpretations), InSiGHT Colon Cancer Gene Variant Database (LOVD), ClinVar database (classification benign by GeneDx, and likely benign by Ambry Genetics and Invitae), and UMD (2x with a “likely neutral” classification, and co-occurring with a pathogenic APC mutation, c.1312+3A>G). This variant was also identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 2 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0004); HAPMAP-EUR in 2 of 1006 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002); NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) in 4 of 8582 European American alleles, and the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (released Jan 13, 2015) in 14 of 66536 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) from a population of European (Non-Finnish) individuals. The p.Lys150Lys variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Classic or attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis Benign:1
Jan 11, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.83
PhyloP100
3.8
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116020626; hg19: chr5-112111353; API