NM_000051.4:c.2442C>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.2442C>A(p.Asp814Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,613,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0069 ( 16 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0590

Variant links:

Genes affected

ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

ATM links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0053078234).

BP6

Variant 11-108259051-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108259051-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 133607.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108259051-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-108259051-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00691 (1053/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0235 (976/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0223. There are 16 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 492 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 16 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ATM	NM_000051.4 link	c.2442C>A	p.Asp814Glu	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 63	ENST00000675843.1	NP_000042.3	Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ATM	ENST00000675843.1 link	c.2442C>A	p.Asp814Glu	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 63		NM_000051.4	ENSP00000501606.1		Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00690

AC:

1051

AN:

152210

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0235

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00353

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00716

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00191

AC:

480

AN:

251096

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00155

AC XY:

210

AN XY:

135752

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00147

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000791

AC:

1156

AN:

1461186

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000713

AC XY:

518

AN XY:

726908

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0241

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00217

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00691

AC:

1053

AN:

152328

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00660

AC XY:

492

AN XY:

74492

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0235

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00346

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00709

Alfa

AF:

0.00113

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00811

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000259

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0198

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00212

AC:

257

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:25Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7Other:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 30, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 29, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 15, 2020

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome

Benign:5

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 09, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 24, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

not provided

Benign:4

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

ATM: BS1, BS2 -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Jan 06, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Sep 29, 2020

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Nov 30, 2020

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 29, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Familial cancer of breast

Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 08, 2024

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:1

May 31, 2022

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast

Benign:1

Jul 26, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Benign:1

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The ATM p.Asp814Glu variant was identified in 1 of 9370 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was present in 6 of 11286 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from healthy individuals (Johnson 2007, Mangone 2015, Tavtigian 2009). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs3218695) as "With Benign, Likely benign allele", ClinVar (4x, benign), and Clinvitae (3x, benign). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, or the ATM-LOVD databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 646 of 276916 chromosomes (8 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 567 of 24008 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Other in 9 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 51 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 18 of 126598 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 1 of 30764 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Asp814 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms. However computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is also not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.48

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.25

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.96

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.081

.;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.32

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.27

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.80

LIST_S2

Benign

0.76

T;T;.

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0053

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.75

MutationAssessor

Benign

2.0

.;M;M

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.57

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.94

N;N;N

REVEL

Uncertain

0.34

Sift

Benign

0.95

T;T;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;T;T

Polyphen

0.41

.;B;B

Vest4

0.63, 0.65

MutPred

0.13

Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);

MVP

0.81

MPC

0.22

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

0.50

Varity_R

0.21

gMVP

0.22

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over