rs3218695

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.2442C>A​(p.Asp814Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00137 in 1,613,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D814G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0069 ( 16 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00079 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

1
4
13

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0590

Publications

27 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
ATM Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
  • ataxia telangiectasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • prostate cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • gastric carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 38 uncertain in NM_000051.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0053078234).
BP6
Variant 11-108259051-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108259051-C-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 133607.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00691 (1053/152328) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0235 (976/41560). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0223. There are 16 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 492 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 16 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkc.2442C>A p.Asp814Glu missense_variant Exon 16 of 63 ENST00000675843.1 NP_000042.3 Q13315A0A024R3C7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkc.2442C>A p.Asp814Glu missense_variant Exon 16 of 63 NM_000051.4 ENSP00000501606.1 Q13315

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00690
AC:
1051
AN:
152210
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0235
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00716
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00191
AC:
480
AN:
251096
AF XY:
0.00155
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000791
AC:
1156
AN:
1461186
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000713
AC XY:
518
AN XY:
726908
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0241
AC:
806
AN:
33458
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00179
AC:
80
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26120
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39632
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
3
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53214
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
8
AN:
5682
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000115
AC:
128
AN:
1111758
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00217
AC:
131
AN:
60366
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.456
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
122
184
245
306
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
28
56
84
112
140
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00691
AC:
1053
AN:
152328
Hom.:
16
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00660
AC XY:
492
AN XY:
74492
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0235
AC:
976
AN:
41560
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00346
AC:
53
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
9
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00709
AC:
15
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
52
104
157
209
261
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00225
Hom.:
20
Bravo
AF:
0.00811
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000259
AC:
1
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0198
AC:
87
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00212
AC:
257
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7Other:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 16, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 15, 2020
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 30, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 29, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 19, 2013
ITMI
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:reference population

- -

-
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:5
Feb 09, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 24, 2017
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

not provided Benign:4
Jan 06, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ATM: BS1, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 30, 2020
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 29, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Sep 29, 2020
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Familial cancer of breast Benign:2
May 08, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
May 31, 2022
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Jul 26, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The ATM p.Asp814Glu variant was identified in 1 of 9370 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0001) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was present in 6 of 11286 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.0005) from healthy individuals (Johnson 2007, Mangone 2015, Tavtigian 2009). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs3218695) as "With Benign, Likely benign allele", ClinVar (4x, benign), and Clinvitae (3x, benign). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, or the ATM-LOVD databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 646 of 276916 chromosomes (8 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.002 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Observations by population include African in 567 of 24008 chromosomes (freq: 0.02), Other in 9 of 6464 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), Latino in 51 of 34412 chromosomes (freq: 0.001), European in 18 of 126598 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 1 of 30764 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003). The variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. The p.Asp814 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms. However computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is also not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.48
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.081
.;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.32
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.27
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.76
T;T;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0053
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.75
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
.;M;M
PhyloP100
-0.059
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.94
N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.34
Sift
Benign
0.95
T;T;T
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
D;T;T
Polyphen
0.41
.;B;B
Vest4
0.63, 0.65
MutPred
0.13
Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);Gain of ubiquitination at K810 (P = 0.0817);
MVP
0.81
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
0.011
T
GERP RS
0.50
Varity_R
0.21
gMVP
0.22
Mutation Taster
=83/17
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3218695; hg19: chr11-108129778; API