NM_000138.5:c.3463+3A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000138.5(FBN1):c.3463+3A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000936 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 36 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00085 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

FBN1
NM_000138.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.1757

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.68

Variant links:

Genes affected

FBN1 (HGNC:3603): (fibrillin 1) This gene encodes a member of the fibrillin family of proteins. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate two proteins including the extracellular matrix component fibrillin-1 and the protein hormone asprosin. Fibrillin-1 is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that serves as a structural component of calcium-binding microfibrils. These microfibrils provide force-bearing structural support in elastic and nonelastic connective tissue throughout the body. Asprosin, secreted by white adipose tissue, has been shown to regulate glucose homeostasis. Mutations in this gene are associated with Marfan syndrome and the related MASS phenotype, as well as ectopia lentis syndrome, Weill-Marchesani syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome and neonatal progeroid syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2016]

FBN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).

BP6

Variant 15-48487309-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48487309-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 42337.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-48487309-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00176 (268/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.044 (228/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0394. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 146 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 268 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBN1	NM_000138.5 link	c.3463+3A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 28 of 65	ENST00000316623.10	NP_000129.3	P35555
FBN1	NM_001406716.1 link	c.3463+3A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 27 of 64		NP_001393645.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBN1	ENST00000316623.10 link	c.3463+3A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 28 of 65	1	NM_000138.5	ENSP00000325527.5		P35555

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00174

AC:

265

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000459

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0434

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00358

AC:

901

AN:

251480

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00304

AC XY:

413

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0474

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00130

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000850

AC:

1243

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000744

AC XY:

541

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000894

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0245

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000626

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000117

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00313

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00176

AC:

268

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00196

AC XY:

146

AN XY:

74432

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.0440

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000349

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00187

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0230

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:16

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:4

Mar 09, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 04, 2018

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jul 24, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:3

Sep 14, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -

May 01, 2013

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Feb 14, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Marfan syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Stiff skin syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Weill-Marchesani syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Geleophysic dysplasia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Acromicric dysplasia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Aug 19, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Marfan syndrome;C4707243:Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Ectopia lentis 1, isolated, autosomal dominant

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Dec 22, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.92

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.18

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.29

SpliceAI score (max)

0.070

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over