NM_000222.3:c.2847C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000222.3(KIT):​c.2847C>T​(p.Pro949Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00341 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 128 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.017 ( 83 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 45 hom. )

Consequence

KIT
NM_000222.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.569
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIT (HGNC:6342): (KIT proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase. This gene was initially identified as a homolog of the feline sarcoma viral oncogene v-kit and is often referred to as proto-oncogene c-Kit. The canonical form of this glycosylated transmembrane protein has an N-terminal extracellular region with five immunoglobulin-like domains, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain at the C-terminus. Upon activation by its cytokine ligand, stem cell factor (SCF), this protein phosphorylates multiple intracellular proteins that play a role in in the proliferation, differentiation, migration and apoptosis of many cell types and thereby plays an important role in hematopoiesis, stem cell maintenance, gametogenesis, melanogenesis, and in mast cell development, migration and function. This protein can be a membrane-bound or soluble protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, mast cell disease, acute myelogenous leukemia, and piebaldism. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
Variant 4-54738473-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr4-54738473-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 348955.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr4-54738473-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.569 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0561 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KITNM_000222.3 linkc.2847C>T p.Pro949Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 21 ENST00000288135.6 NP_000213.1 P10721-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KITENST00000288135.6 linkc.2847C>T p.Pro949Pro synonymous_variant Exon 21 of 21 1 NM_000222.3 ENSP00000288135.6 P10721-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0169
AC:
2577
AN:
152098
Hom.:
76
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0575
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00838
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0110
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00484
AC:
1214
AN:
251080
Hom.:
26
AF XY:
0.00343
AC XY:
466
AN XY:
135730
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0588
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000653
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00199
AC:
2905
AN:
1461806
Hom.:
45
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00170
AC XY:
1238
AN XY:
727206
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0523
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00470
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000558
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00447
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0171
AC:
2606
AN:
152216
Hom.:
83
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0166
AC XY:
1235
AN XY:
74422
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0581
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00837
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000865
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0109
Alfa
AF:
0.00974
Hom.:
20
Bravo
AF:
0.0198
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00549
AC:
19
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000763
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Nov 20, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2018
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mastocytosis Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

KIT-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 18, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Piebaldism Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 09, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.69
CADD
Benign
1.0
DANN
Benign
0.51

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56288823; hg19: chr4-55604639; COSMIC: COSV55393118; API