NM_000249.4:c.30G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000249.4(MLH1):c.30G>T(p.Arg10Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R10R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000249.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Lynch syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- Lynch syndrome 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
- Muir-Torre syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
- Lynch syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- malignant pancreatic neoplasmInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- rhabdomyosarcomaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- prostate cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000249.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLH1 | NM_000249.4 | MANE Select | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 19 | NP_000240.1 | ||
| MLH1 | NM_001354628.2 | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 18 | NP_001341557.1 | |||
| MLH1 | NM_001354629.2 | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 18 | NP_001341558.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLH1 | ENST00000231790.8 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 19 | ENSP00000231790.3 | ||
| MLH1 | ENST00000456676.7 | TSL:1 | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 17 | ENSP00000416687.3 | ||
| MLH1 | ENST00000413740.2 | TSL:1 | c.30G>T | p.Arg10Arg | synonymous | Exon 1 of 15 | ENSP00000416476.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251442 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000130 AC: 19AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74402 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
The MLH1 p.Arg10= variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight-COGR, UMD-LSDB, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant Database, or the Insight Hereditary Tumors database. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs876660759) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Color Genomics, Invitae; as uncertain significance by Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America), and Clinvitae databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 2 of 277228 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00001 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 1 of 24038 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), European in 1 of 126712 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Arg10= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
not specified Benign:1
Colorectal cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis, type 2 Benign:1
This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.
Lynch syndrome Benign:1
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at