NM_000431.4:c.405G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000431.4(MVK):​c.405G>A​(p.Ser135Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.048 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,437 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.051 ( 285 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.048 ( 2152 hom. )

Consequence

MVK
NM_000431.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.38

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MVK (HGNC:7530): (mevalonate kinase) This gene encodes the peroxisomal enzyme mevalonate kinase. Mevalonate is a key intermediate, and mevalonate kinase a key early enzyme, in isoprenoid and sterol synthesis. Mevalonate kinase deficiency caused by mutation of this gene results in mevalonic aciduria, a disease characterized psychomotor retardation, failure to thrive, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia and recurrent febrile crises. Defects in this gene also cause hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome, a disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of fever associated with lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, gastrointestinal dismay and skin rash. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
MVK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • porokeratosis 3, disseminated superficial actinic type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hyperimmunoglobulinemia D with periodic fever
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P
  • mevalonic aciduria
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • porokeratosis of Mibelli
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 12-109581428-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109581428-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 129639.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.39 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0607 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MVKNM_000431.4 linkc.405G>A p.Ser135Ser synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 11 ENST00000228510.8 NP_000422.1 Q03426B2RDU6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MVKENST00000228510.8 linkc.405G>A p.Ser135Ser synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 11 1 NM_000431.4 ENSP00000228510.3 Q03426

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0512
AC:
7787
AN:
152146
Hom.:
285
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0394
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0615
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0306
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0694
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0110
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0916
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0701
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0623
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0503
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0449
AC:
11281
AN:
251052
AF XY:
0.0448
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0403
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0240
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0641
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0861
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0584
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0505
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0477
AC:
69725
AN:
1461814
Hom.:
2152
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0477
AC XY:
34668
AN XY:
727218
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0416
AC:
1394
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0259
AC:
1160
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0636
AC:
1661
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0133
AC:
1151
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0876
AC:
4675
AN:
53394
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0582
AC:
334
AN:
5742
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0509
AC:
56571
AN:
1112002
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0460
AC:
2775
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.479
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4489
8979
13468
17958
22447
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1850
3700
5550
7400
9250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0512
AC:
7795
AN:
152266
Hom.:
285
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0507
AC XY:
3776
AN XY:
74456
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0395
AC:
1640
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0306
AC:
468
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0694
AC:
241
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0112
AC:
54
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0916
AC:
972
AN:
10614
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0822
AC:
24
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0623
AC:
4234
AN:
67998
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0497
AC:
105
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
385
770
1156
1541
1926
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0585
Hom.:
211
Bravo
AF:
0.0446
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00866
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0588
EpiControl
AF:
0.0528

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -

not provided Benign:3Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mevalonic aciduria Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hyperimmunoglobulin D with periodic fever;C1867981:Porokeratosis 3, disseminated superficial actinic type;C1959626:Mevalonic aciduria Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Dec 12, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hyperimmunoglobulin D with periodic fever Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
0.27
DANN
Benign
0.64
PhyloP100
-4.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34368092; hg19: chr12-110019233; COSMIC: COSV57331610; COSMIC: COSV57331610; API