rs34368092
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_000431.4(MVK):c.405G>A(p.Ser135=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.048 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,437 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.051 ( 285 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.048 ( 2152 hom. )
Consequence
MVK
NM_000431.4 synonymous
NM_000431.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.38
Genes affected
MVK (HGNC:7530): (mevalonate kinase) This gene encodes the peroxisomal enzyme mevalonate kinase. Mevalonate is a key intermediate, and mevalonate kinase a key early enzyme, in isoprenoid and sterol synthesis. Mevalonate kinase deficiency caused by mutation of this gene results in mevalonic aciduria, a disease characterized psychomotor retardation, failure to thrive, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia and recurrent febrile crises. Defects in this gene also cause hyperimmunoglobulinaemia D and periodic fever syndrome, a disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of fever associated with lymphadenopathy, arthralgia, gastrointestinal dismay and skin rash. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
?
Variant 12-109581428-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109581428-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129639.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109581428-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.39 with no splicing effect.
BA1
?
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0607 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVK | NM_000431.4 | c.405G>A | p.Ser135= | synonymous_variant | 5/11 | ENST00000228510.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVK | ENST00000228510.8 | c.405G>A | p.Ser135= | synonymous_variant | 5/11 | 1 | NM_000431.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0512 AC: 7787AN: 152146Hom.: 285 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
7787
AN:
152146
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0449 AC: 11281AN: 251052Hom.: 375 AF XY: 0.0448 AC XY: 6080AN XY: 135744
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
11281
AN:
251052
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6080
AN XY:
135744
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0477 AC: 69725AN: 1461814Hom.: 2152 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0477 AC XY: 34668AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
69725
AN:
1461814
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
34668
AN XY:
727218
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0512 AC: 7795AN: 152266Hom.: 285 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0507 AC XY: 3776AN XY: 74456
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
7795
AN:
152266
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
3776
AN XY:
74456
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
30
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: MAF - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 08, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. - |
Mevalonic aciduria Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Hyperimmunoglobulin D with periodic fever;C1867981:Porokeratosis 3, disseminated superficial actinic type;C1959626:Mevalonic aciduria Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 12, 2016 | - - |
Hyperimmunoglobulin D with periodic fever Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at