NM_000465.4:c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PM4
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT(p.Leu95_Ile97del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion, synonymous change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. D94D) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 disruptive_inframe_deletion, synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- familial ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancerInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000465.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARD1 | NM_000465.4 | MANE Select | c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu95_Ile97del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 3 of 11 | NP_000456.2 | ||
| BARD1 | NM_001282543.2 | c.225_234delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu76_Ile78del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 2 of 10 | NP_001269472.1 | |||
| BARD1 | NM_001282549.2 | c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu95_Ile97del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 3 of 5 | NP_001269478.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARD1 | ENST00000260947.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu95_Ile97del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 3 of 11 | ENSP00000260947.4 | ||
| BARD1 | ENST00000617164.5 | TSL:1 | c.225_234delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu76_Ile78del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 2 of 10 | ENSP00000480470.1 | ||
| BARD1 | ENST00000613706.5 | TSL:1 | c.282_291delCTTGAAGATAinsT | p.Leu95_Ile97del | disruptive_inframe_deletion synonymous | Exon 3 of 11 | ENSP00000484976.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 30
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
In-frame deletion of three amino acids in a non-repeat region; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis indicates that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18480049)
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
The c.282_291del10insT variant (also known as p.L95_I97del), located in coding exon 3 of the BARD1 gene, results from an in-frame deletion of 10 nucleotides and insertion of T at nucleotide positions 282 to 291. This results in the in-frame deletion of three residues (LKI) from codon 95 to 97. These amino acid positions are generally well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis (Choi Y et al. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(10):e46688). Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
This variant causes an in-frame deletion of three amino acids in exon 3 of the BARD1 protein. Splice site prediction tools suggest that this variant may not impact RNA splicing. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available for this variant, and the functional significance of the deleted amino acids is currently unknown. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BARD1-related disease. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 421984). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This variant, c.282_291delinsT, is a complex sequence change that results in the deletion of 3 amino acids of the BARD1 protein (p.Leu95_Ile97del).
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: BARD1 c.282_291delinsT (p.Leu95_Ile97del) results in an in-frame deletion that is predicted to remove three amino acids from the encoded protein. The variant was absent in 251182 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.282_291delinsT in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at