NM_000642.3:c.1481G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000642.3(AGL):​c.1481G>A​(p.Arg494His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00828 in 1,613,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R494C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0072 ( 11 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0084 ( 84 hom. )

Consequence

AGL
NM_000642.3 missense

Scores

7
7
4

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
AGL (HGNC:321): (amylo-alpha-1, 6-glucosidase, 4-alpha-glucanotransferase) This gene encodes the glycogen debrancher enzyme which is involved in glycogen degradation. This enzyme has two independent catalytic activities which occur at different sites on the protein: a 4-alpha-glucotransferase activity and a amylo-1,6-glucosidase activity. Mutations in this gene are associated with glycogen storage disease although a wide range of enzymatic and clinical variability occurs which may be due to tissue-specific alternative splicing. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01898399).
BP6
Variant 1-99877698-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-99877698-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256723.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-99877698-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00719 (1094/152200) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00907 (617/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00848. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 601 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
AGLNM_000642.3 linkc.1481G>A p.Arg494His missense_variant Exon 12 of 34 ENST00000361915.8 NP_000633.2 P35573-1A0A0S2A4E4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
AGLENST00000361915.8 linkc.1481G>A p.Arg494His missense_variant Exon 12 of 34 1 NM_000642.3 ENSP00000355106.3 P35573-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00720
AC:
1095
AN:
152082
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00140
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00236
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00907
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00843
AC:
2119
AN:
251244
Hom.:
25
AF XY:
0.00874
AC XY:
1186
AN XY:
135772
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00234
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0309
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0109
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00735
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00839
AC:
12269
AN:
1461746
Hom.:
84
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00839
AC XY:
6103
AN XY:
727180
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000747
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000985
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0301
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00892
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00667
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00719
AC:
1094
AN:
152200
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00808
AC XY:
601
AN XY:
74414
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00231
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0338
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00907
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00473
Alfa
AF:
0.00740
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.00475
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00647
AC:
24
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00908
AC:
35
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00182
AC:
8
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00837
AC:
72
ExAC
AF:
0.00888
AC:
1078
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00780
EpiControl
AF:
0.00699

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Glycogen storage disease type III Benign:5
Dec 31, 2019
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 28, 2017
Counsyl
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Nov 01, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 22, 2017
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 29, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

AGL: BS2 -

not specified Benign:3
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in a patient with two other pathogenic variants, clinical significance is uncertain. Frequency 1.8%. -

Apr 25, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Aug 23, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

AGL-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 23, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.23
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.0040
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.23
CADD
Pathogenic
27
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.45
T;T;T;T;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.87
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.80
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.97
D;.;.;.;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.019
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
0.79
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.5
H;H;H;H;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.72
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-4.3
D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.89
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.80
MVP
0.94
MPC
0.32
ClinPred
0.049
T
GERP RS
5.1
Varity_R
0.55
gMVP
0.86

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141043166; hg19: chr1-100343254; COSMIC: COSV54055353; COSMIC: COSV54055353; API