chr1-99877698-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000361915.8(AGL):c.1481G>A(p.Arg494His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00828 in 1,613,946 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 95 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R494C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000361915.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | NM_000642.3 | c.1481G>A | p.Arg494His | missense_variant | 12/34 | ENST00000361915.8 | NP_000633.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | ENST00000361915.8 | c.1481G>A | p.Arg494His | missense_variant | 12/34 | 1 | NM_000642.3 | ENSP00000355106 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00720 AC: 1095AN: 152082Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00843 AC: 2119AN: 251244Hom.: 25 AF XY: 0.00874 AC XY: 1186AN XY: 135772
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00839 AC: 12269AN: 1461746Hom.: 84 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00839 AC XY: 6103AN XY: 727180
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00719 AC: 1094AN: 152200Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00808 AC XY: 601AN XY: 74414
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease type III Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Dec 28, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Mar 06, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | AGL: BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 23, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Aug 29, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Nov 22, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 25, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 23, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 28, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Reported in a patient with two other pathogenic variants, clinical significance is uncertain. Frequency 1.8%. - |
AGL-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 23, 2022 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at