NM_001005738.2:c.383T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_001005738.2(FPR2):c.383T>C(p.Leu128Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L128R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001005738.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- susceptibility to localized juvenile periodontitisInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Tourette syndromeInheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001005738.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPR2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.383T>C | p.Leu128Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000340191.4 | P25090 | ||
| FPR2 | TSL:1 | c.383T>C | p.Leu128Pro | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000468897.1 | P25090 | ||
| FPR2 | TSL:2 | c.383T>C | p.Leu128Pro | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000468876.1 | P25090 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at