NM_001110792.2:c.855G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001110792.2(MECP2):c.855G>T(p.Gly285Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000542 in 1,210,680 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 227 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110792.2 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | NM_001110792.2 | c.855G>T | p.Gly285Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | ENST00000453960.7 | NP_001104262.1 | |
MECP2 | NM_004992.4 | c.819G>T | p.Gly273Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000303391.11 | NP_004983.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MECP2 | ENST00000453960.7 | c.855G>T | p.Gly285Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 3 of 3 | 1 | NM_001110792.2 | ENSP00000395535.2 | ||
MECP2 | ENST00000303391.11 | c.819G>T | p.Gly273Gly | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | 1 | NM_004992.4 | ENSP00000301948.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000569 AC: 64AN: 112438Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000491 AC XY: 17AN XY: 34596
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000461 AC: 84AN: 182177Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000490 AC XY: 33AN XY: 67413
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000539 AC: 592AN: 1098189Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000578 AC XY: 210AN XY: 363563
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000569 AC: 64AN: 112491Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000490 AC XY: 17AN XY: 34659
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Rett syndrome Benign:3
This variant has been collected from RettBASE and curated to current modified ACMG/AMP criteria.Based on the classification scheme defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders Specifications to the ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines VCEP 2.0, this variant is classified as Benign. At least the following criteria are met: The allele frequency of this variant in at least one population in gnomAD is higher than the 0.03% threshold defined by the ClinGen Rett/Angelman-like Expert Panel for Rett/AS-like Disorders VCEP 2.0 (BA1). -
The variant of interest causes a synonymous change with 3/5 in silico programs predicting no significant effect on splicing, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in a large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 48/85990 (1/1791 including 18 hemizygotes), which exceeds the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic MECP2 variant. The variant of interest has been reported in affected individuals via publications and reputable clinical laboratories/databases with a classification of "benign/polymorphism." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. -
- -
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Severe neonatal-onset encephalopathy with microcephaly Benign:1
- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
MECP2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at