NM_001164507.2:c.23763G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_001164507.2(NEB):āc.23763G>Cā(p.Leu7921Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000683 in 1,611,280 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001164507.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEB | ENST00000397345.8 | c.23763G>C | p.Leu7921Phe | missense_variant | Exon 166 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164508.2 | ENSP00000380505.3 | ||
NEB | ENST00000427231.7 | c.23763G>C | p.Leu7921Phe | missense_variant | Exon 166 of 182 | 5 | NM_001164507.2 | ENSP00000416578.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000855 AC: 13AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000317 AC: 79AN: 248908Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000207 AC XY: 28AN XY: 135038
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000665 AC: 97AN: 1459058Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000496 AC XY: 36AN XY: 725980
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000854 AC: 13AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Nemaline myopathy 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
- -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
NEB-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at