NM_001194998.2:c.3278G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001194998.2(CEP152):c.3278G>A(p.Cys1093Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000939 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0053 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00048 ( 8 hom. )

Consequence

CEP152
NM_001194998.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.15

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CEP152 (HGNC:29298): (centrosomal protein 152) This gene encodes a protein that is thought to be involved with centrosome function. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary microcephaly (MCPH4). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

CEP152 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

microcephaly with or without short stature
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Seckel syndrome 5
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal recessive primary microcephaly
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Seckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

CEP152 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011366397).

BP6

Variant 15-48755970-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-48755970-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 158252.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00533 (812/152258) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0188 (782/41562). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0177. There are 8 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 358 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	NM_001194998.2 link	c.3278G>A	p.Cys1093Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	ENST00000380950.7	NP_001181927.1	O94986-4Q3B7A2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CEP152	ENST00000380950.7 link	c.3278G>A	p.Cys1093Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 27	1	NM_001194998.2	ENSP00000370337.2	O94986-4
CEP152	ENST00000399334.7 link	c.3278G>A	p.Cys1093Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 20 of 26	1		ENSP00000382271.3	O94986-3
CEP152	ENST00000325747.9 link	c.2999G>A	p.Cys1000Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 25	1		ENSP00000321000.5	O94986-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00532

AC:

809

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0188

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00287

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00127

AC:

318

AN:

249418

AF XY:

0.00106

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0194

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000348

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000661

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000481

AC:

703

AN:

1461788

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000415

AC XY:

302

AN XY:

727196

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0179

AC:

599

AN:

33476

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26130

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86252

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000719

AC:

AN:

1111948

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00118

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.477

Heterozygous variant carriers

104

155

207

259

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

110

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00533

AC:

812

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00481

AC XY:

358

AN XY:

74426

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0188

AC:

782

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00131

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10584

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68030

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00284

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.506

Heterozygous variant carriers

110

146

183

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00234

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00586

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0176

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00150

AC:

181

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Jan 25, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 13, 2016

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Feb 08, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 20, 2017

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Microcephaly 9, primary, autosomal recessive

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Seckel syndrome 5

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.27

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.24

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.10

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.074

T;.;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.74

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.72

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.96

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;D;T

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.41

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.2

M;M;.

PhyloP100

3.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.46

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-4.7

D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.37

Sift

Uncertain

0.0020

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.023

D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;D

Vest4

0.89

MVP

0.90

MPC

0.50

ClinPred

0.042

GERP RS

5.8

Varity_R

0.78

gMVP

0.45

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over