NM_001252024.2:c.536C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 1P and 12B. PP3BP4_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001252024.2(TRPM1):c.536C>T(p.Ser179Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00431 in 1,614,100 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 29 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0044 ( 26 hom. )

Consequence

TRPM1
NM_001252024.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.99

Variant links:

Genes affected

TRPM1 (HGNC:7146): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M member 1) This gene encodes a member of the transient receptor potential melastatin subfamily of transient receptor potential ion channels. The encoded protein is a calcium permeable cation channel that is expressed in melanocytes and may play a role in melanin synthesis. Specific mutations in this gene are the cause autosomal recessive complete congenital stationary night blindness-1C. The expression of this protein is inversely correlated with melanoma aggressiveness and as such it is used as a prognostic marker for melanoma metastasis. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

TRPM1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 6: Cadd, Eigen, FATHMM_MKL, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN [when BayesDel_addAF, max_spliceai, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.011376858).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00382 (581/152246) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00616 (419/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00567. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 289 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TRPM1	NM_001252024.2 link	c.536C>T	p.Ser179Phe	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 28	ENST00000256552.11	NP_001238953.1	Q7Z4N2-6
TRPM1	NM_001252020.2 link	c.587C>T	p.Ser196Phe	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 27		NP_001238949.1	Q7Z4N2-5
TRPM1	NM_002420.6 link	c.470C>T	p.Ser157Phe	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 27		NP_002411.3	Q7Z4N2-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TRPM1	ENST00000256552.11 link	c.536C>T	p.Ser179Phe	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 28	1	NM_001252024.2	ENSP00000256552.7		Q7Z4N2-6

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00382

AC:

581

AN:

152128

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000676

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00565

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00616

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00323

AC:

806

AN:

249574

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00316

AC XY:

428

AN XY:

135402

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000839

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00473

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00531

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00396

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00436

AC:

6376

AN:

1461854

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00436

AC XY:

3174

AN XY:

727228

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000806

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00142

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00462

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00520

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00328

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00382

AC:

581

AN:

152246

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00388

AC XY:

289

AN XY:

74458

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000674

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00412

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00202

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00565

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00616

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00497

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00329

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00701

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00649

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00105

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00316

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00319

AC:

385

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00442

EpiControl

AF:

0.00421

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Nov 20, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

TRPM1: BS1, BS2 -

Congenital stationary night blindness 1C

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Oct 31, 2018

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Retinitis pigmentosa

Uncertain:1

Apr 01, 2018

Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

TRPM1-related disorder

Benign:1

Dec 21, 2020

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.56

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.15

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

0.020

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.49

T;.;.;T;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

1.1

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

1.0

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

1.0

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.93

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.14

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.0

M;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.72

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-5.2

D;D;D;D;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.51

Sift

Uncertain

0.011

D;D;D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.011

D;D;D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;.;.;.;.

Vest4

0.91

MVP

0.47

MPC

0.84

ClinPred

0.057

GERP RS

6.1

Varity_R

0.63

gMVP

0.57

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over