NM_001358664.2:c.492A>C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_001358664.2(GSTT4):c.492A>C(p.Ser164Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 38)
Failed GnomAD Quality Control
Consequence
GSTT4
NM_001358664.2 synonymous
NM_001358664.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.22
Publications
0 publications found
Genes affected
GSTT4 (HGNC:26930): (glutathione S-transferase theta 4) Predicted to enable glutathione transferase activity. Predicted to be involved in glutathione metabolic process. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 22-24000111-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-24000111-T-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 3771092.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.22 with no splicing effect.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001358664.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSTT4 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.492A>C | p.Ser164Ser | synonymous | Exon 4 of 5 | ENSP00000492273.1 | A0A1W2PR19 | ||
| GSTT4 | TSL:1 | n.*134A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000492640.1 | A0A1W2PRF8 | |||
| GSTT4 | TSL:1 | n.*134A>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 3 of 4 | ENSP00000492640.1 | A0A1W2PRF8 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 0
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
0
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152232Hom.: 0 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74368 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
152232
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74368
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
41446
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
4838
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
68044
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2094
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.225
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
0
1
1
2
2
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
ClinVar
ClinVar submissions
View on ClinVar Significance:Likely benign
Revision:criteria provided, single submitter
Pathogenic
VUS
Benign
Condition
-
-
1
not provided (1)
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.