NM_001370259.2:c.30G>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001370259.2(MEN1):c.30G>T(p.Leu10Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000557 in 1,604,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 1 hom., cov: 30)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00051 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

MEN1
NM_001370259.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.502

Variant links:

Genes affected

MEN1 (HGNC:7010): (menin 1) This gene encodes menin, a tumor suppressor associated with a syndrome known as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Menin is a scaffold protein that functions in histone modification and epigenetic gene regulation. It is thought to regulate several pathways and processes by altering chromatin structure through the modification of histones. [provided by RefSeq, May 2019]

MEN1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).

BP6

Variant 11-64810080-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-64810080-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136169.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.502 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00102 (155/151938) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00132 (90/67974). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0011. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 98 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 155 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MEN1	NM_001370259.2 link	c.30G>T	p.Leu10Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 10	ENST00000450708.7	NP_001357188.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MEN1	ENST00000450708.7 link	c.30G>T	p.Leu10Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 10	5	NM_001370259.2	ENSP00000394933.3		O00255-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00102

AC:

155

AN:

151828

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00569

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000687

AC:

158

AN:

230010

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000635

AC XY:

AN XY:

125960

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000706

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000893

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00134

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000684

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00467

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000542

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00105

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000509

AC:

739

AN:

1452944

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000526

AC XY:

380

AN XY:

722296

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000300

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000679

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000211

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00601

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000316

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000533

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00102

AC:

155

AN:

151938

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00132

AC XY:

AN XY:

74254

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00144

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00569

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.00177

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000389

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 1

Benign:6

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Apr 17, 2023

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Sep 20, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 21, 2015

Counsyl

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MEN1: BP4, BP7 -

Mar 26, 2018

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

May 30, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 09, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Aug 06, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

May 10, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Hyperparathyroidism

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.95

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over