NM_001374736.1:c.3385C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001374736.1(DST):c.3385C>T(p.His1129Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,864 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H1129N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001374736.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type 6Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- epidermolysis bullosa simplex 3, localized or generalized intermediate, with BP230 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DST | ENST00000680361.1 | c.3385C>T | p.His1129Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 26 of 104 | NM_001374736.1 | ENSP00000505098.1 | |||
| DST | ENST00000370765.11 | c.1774C>T | p.His592Tyr | missense_variant | Exon 12 of 24 | 1 | NM_001723.7 | ENSP00000359801.6 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  6.84e-7  AC: 1AN: 1461864Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.00000138  AC XY: 1AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 genome  
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at