NM_001384474.1:c.2914G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):c.2914G>A(p.Glu972Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000228 in 1,551,574 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

LOXHD1
NM_001384474.1 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.90

Variant links:

Genes affected

LOXHD1 (HGNC:26521): (lipoxygenase homology PLAT domains 1) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein consisting entirely of PLAT (polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin) domains, thought to be involved in targeting proteins to the plasma membrane. Studies in mice show that this gene is expressed in the mechanosensory hair cells in the inner ear, and mutations in this gene lead to auditory defects, indicating that this gene is essential for normal hair cell function. Screening of human families segregating deafness identified a mutation in this gene which causes DFNB77, a progressive form of autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (ARNSHL). Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

LOXHD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007861972).

BP6

Variant 18-46560230-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr18-46560230-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 228822.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=4}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00122 (186/152302) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00421 (175/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0037. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 90 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LOXHD1	NM_001384474.1 link	c.2914G>A	p.Glu972Lys	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 41	ENST00000642948.1	NP_001371403.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LOXHD1	ENST00000642948.1 link	c.2914G>A	p.Glu972Lys	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 41		NM_001384474.1	ENSP00000496347.1	A0A2R8Y7K4
LOXHD1	ENST00000536736.5 link	c.2914G>A	p.Glu972Lys	missense_variant	Exon 19 of 40	5		ENSP00000444586.1	F5GZB4
LOXHD1	ENST00000441551.6 link	c.2599-2741G>A		intron_variant	Intron 18 of 38	5		ENSP00000387621.2	Q8IVV2-1
LOXHD1	ENST00000335730.6 link	n.2227G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 12 of 27	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00122

AC:

185

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00420

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00143

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

158796

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000203

AC XY:

AN XY:

83566

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00443

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000161

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000439

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000443

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000119

AC:

167

AN:

1399272

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000942

AC XY:

AN XY:

690078

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00437

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000127

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000278

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000224

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00122

AC:

186

AN:

152302

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74460

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00421

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000706

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00138

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00289

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000206

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Jan 08, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

UNC Molecular Genetics Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

The LOXHD1 c.2914G>A (p.E972K) missense variant has not been reported in association with hearing loss; therefore is a variant of uncertain significance. -

Sep 12, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 03, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Jan 03, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Glu972Lys var iant in LOXHD1 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss , but has been identified in 0.32% (9/2784) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs367630521) . Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Gl u972Lys variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predi ctive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significa nce of the p.Glu972Lys variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. -

LOXHD1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jun 17, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.55

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

Eigen

Benign

0.036

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.064

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.58

LIST_S2

Benign

0.77

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.052

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0079

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.94

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.64

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.54

N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.050

Sift

Benign

0.17

T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.70

T;.

Polyphen

0.0070

B;.

Vest4

0.40

MVP

0.061

ClinPred

0.0096

GERP RS

3.1

gMVP

0.32

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over