chr18-46560230-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001384474.1(LOXHD1):c.2914G>A(p.Glu972Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000228 in 1,551,574 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/16 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001384474.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOXHD1 | NM_001384474.1 | c.2914G>A | p.Glu972Lys | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 41 | ENST00000642948.1 | NP_001371403.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOXHD1 | ENST00000642948.1 | c.2914G>A | p.Glu972Lys | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 41 | NM_001384474.1 | ENSP00000496347.1 | |||
LOXHD1 | ENST00000536736.5 | c.2914G>A | p.Glu972Lys | missense_variant | Exon 19 of 40 | 5 | ENSP00000444586.1 | |||
LOXHD1 | ENST00000441551.6 | c.2599-2741G>A | intron_variant | Intron 18 of 38 | 5 | ENSP00000387621.2 | ||||
LOXHD1 | ENST00000335730.6 | n.2227G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 12 of 27 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00122 AC: 185AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000309 AC: 49AN: 158796Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000203 AC XY: 17AN XY: 83566
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000119 AC: 167AN: 1399272Hom.: 2 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 65AN XY: 690078
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 90AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 77 Uncertain:3Benign:1
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
The LOXHD1 c.2914G>A (p.E972K) missense variant has not been reported in association with hearing loss; therefore is a variant of uncertain significance. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant classified as Uncertain Significance - Favor Benign. The p.Glu972Lys var iant in LOXHD1 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss , but has been identified in 0.32% (9/2784) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs367630521) . Computational prediction tools and conservation analysis suggest that the p.Gl u972Lys variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predi ctive enough to rule out pathogenicity. In summary, while the clinical significa nce of the p.Glu972Lys variant is uncertain, these data suggest that it is more likely to be benign. -
LOXHD1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at