NM_001394014.1:c.5059C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4BS2
The NM_001394014.1(CDC42BPA):c.5059C>A(p.Pro1687Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000273 in 1,613,238 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001394014.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42BPA | NM_001394014.1 | c.5059C>A | p.Pro1687Thr | missense_variant | Exon 36 of 37 | ENST00000366766.8 | NP_001380943.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDC42BPA | ENST00000366766.8 | c.5059C>A | p.Pro1687Thr | missense_variant | Exon 36 of 37 | 5 | NM_001394014.1 | ENSP00000355728.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000517 AC: 13AN: 251376Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000736 AC XY: 10AN XY: 135860
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000281 AC: 41AN: 1460934Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000330 AC XY: 24AN XY: 726824
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74476
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.4954C>A (p.P1652T) alteration is located in exon 35 (coding exon 35) of the CDC42BPA gene. This alteration results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 4954, causing the proline (P) at amino acid position 1652 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at