NM_001611.5:c.14C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting
The NM_001611.5(ACP5):c.14C>T(p.Thr5Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000942 in 1,613,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T5A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001611.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001611.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACP5 | MANE Select | c.14C>T | p.Thr5Met | missense | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000496973.1 | P13686 | ||
| ACP5 | TSL:1 | c.14C>T | p.Thr5Met | missense | Exon 4 of 7 | ENSP00000218758.4 | P13686 | ||
| ACP5 | c.14C>T | p.Thr5Met | missense | Exon 2 of 5 | ENSP00000559726.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000180 AC: 45AN: 249722 AF XY: 0.000200 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 144AN: 1461570Hom.: 1 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000107 AC XY: 78AN XY: 727052 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000525 AC: 8AN: 152274Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000672 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74452 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at