NM_001903.5:c.546T>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001903.5(CTNNA1):​c.546T>G​(p.Pro182Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0021 in 1,613,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P182P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 29 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 31 hom. )

Consequence

CTNNA1
NM_001903.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.146

Publications

5 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CTNNA1 (HGNC:2509): (catenin alpha 1) This gene encodes a member of the catenin family of proteins that play an important role in cell adhesion process by connecting cadherins located on the plasma membrane to the actin filaments inside the cell. The encoded mechanosensing protein contains three vinculin homology domains and undergoes conformational changes in response to cytoskeletal tension, resulting in the reconfiguration of cadherin-actin filament connections. Certain mutations in this gene cause butterfly-shaped pigment dystrophy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2016]
CTNNA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • CTNNA1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • patterned macular dystrophy 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • patterned macular dystrophy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 5-138812260-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-138812260-T-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 415360.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.146 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0116 (1771/152200) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0407 (1688/41506). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0391. There are 29 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 837 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1771 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001903.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTNNA1
NM_001903.5
MANE Select
c.546T>Gp.Pro182Pro
synonymous
Exon 5 of 18NP_001894.2
CTNNA1
NM_001323982.2
c.546T>Gp.Pro182Pro
synonymous
Exon 6 of 19NP_001310911.1
CTNNA1
NM_001323983.1
c.546T>Gp.Pro182Pro
synonymous
Exon 5 of 18NP_001310912.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CTNNA1
ENST00000302763.12
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.546T>Gp.Pro182Pro
synonymous
Exon 5 of 18ENSP00000304669.7
CTNNA1
ENST00000518825.5
TSL:1
c.546T>Gp.Pro182Pro
synonymous
Exon 4 of 18ENSP00000427821.1
CTNNA1
ENST00000518919.1
TSL:1
n.302T>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 1 of 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0116
AC:
1762
AN:
152082
Hom.:
28
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0405
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00386
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00670
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00306
AC:
768
AN:
251276
AF XY:
0.00222
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0435
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00111
AC:
1617
AN:
1461672
Hom.:
31
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000932
AC XY:
678
AN XY:
727132
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
1364
AN:
33468
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00141
AC:
63
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26128
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39676
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000928
AC:
8
AN:
86224
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53408
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00243
AC:
14
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000360
AC:
40
AN:
1111898
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00212
AC:
128
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
74
148
221
295
369
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
44
88
132
176
220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0116
AC:
1771
AN:
152200
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0112
AC XY:
837
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0407
AC:
1688
AN:
41506
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00379
AC:
58
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000415
AC:
2
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10604
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00342
AC:
1
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00663
AC:
14
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
96
193
289
386
482
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00587
Hom.:
7
Bravo
AF:
0.0129
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Jun 17, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer Benign:1
May 30, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Benign:1
Oct 10, 2024
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing.

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 09, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
8.5
DANN
Benign
0.70
PhyloP100
0.15
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs28363395; hg19: chr5-138147949; COSMIC: COSV104406615; API