NM_002036.4:c.265C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2_Supporting
The NM_002036.4(ACKR1):c.265C>T(p.Arg89Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0125 in 1,614,216 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 197 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R89S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002036.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002036.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACKR1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.265C>T | p.Arg89Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000357104.1 | Q16570-1 | ||
| ACKR1 | TSL:6 | c.271C>T | p.Arg91Cys | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000357103.2 | Q16570-2 | ||
| ACKR1 | c.265C>T | p.Arg89Cys | missense | Exon 3 of 3 | ENSP00000521587.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00993 AC: 1512AN: 152222Hom.: 13 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0112 AC: 2818AN: 250772 AF XY: 0.0121 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0128 AC: 18703AN: 1461876Hom.: 184 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0130 AC XY: 9463AN XY: 727238 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00992 AC: 1511AN: 152340Hom.: 13 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00934 AC XY: 696AN XY: 74490 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at