NM_002217.4:c.202G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_002217.4(ITIH3):c.202G>A(p.Val68Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000294 in 1,613,312 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002217.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITIH3 | ENST00000449956.3 | c.202G>A | p.Val68Ile | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 22 | 1 | NM_002217.4 | ENSP00000415769.2 | ||
ITIH3 | ENST00000703834.1 | c.202G>A | p.Val68Ile | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 23 | ENSP00000515492.1 | ||||
ITIH3 | ENST00000416872.6 | c.202G>A | p.Val68Ile | missense_variant | Exon 3 of 17 | 2 | ENSP00000413922.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000492 AC: 122AN: 247970Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000476 AC XY: 64AN XY: 134496
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000294 AC: 430AN: 1461106Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000286 AC XY: 208AN XY: 726780
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000202 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.202G>A (p.V68I) alteration is located in exon 3 (coding exon 3) of the ITIH3 gene. This alteration results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 202, causing the valine (V) at amino acid position 68 to be replaced by an isoleucine (I). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at