NM_002299.4:c.*10A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_002299.4(LCT):c.*10A>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00307 in 1,597,068 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 23 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002299.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital lactase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_002299.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCT | NM_002299.4 | MANE Select | c.*10A>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 17 of 17 | NP_002290.2 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCT | ENST00000264162.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.*10A>C | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 17 of 17 | ENSP00000264162.2 | P09848 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00369 AC: 562AN: 152158Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00406 AC: 1018AN: 250490 AF XY: 0.00411 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00301 AC: 4349AN: 1444792Hom.: 20 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00305 AC XY: 2193AN XY: 720036 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00368 AC: 561AN: 152276Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00446 AC XY: 332AN XY: 74458 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at