NM_002473.6:c.4878C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.4878C>T(p.Ile1626Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000716 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00074 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0170

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

MYH9 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
macrothrombocytopenia and granulocyte inclusions with or without nephritis or sensorineural hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
May-Hegglin anomaly
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MYH9 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).

BP6

Variant 22-36288306-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36288306-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178431.We mark this variant Benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.017 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00044 (67/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000647 (44/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000495. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 19 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 67 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	NM_002473.6 link	c.4878C>T	p.Ile1626Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 34 of 41	ENST00000216181.11	NP_002464.1	P35579-1A0A024R1N1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYH9	ENST00000216181.11 link	c.4878C>T	p.Ile1626Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 34 of 41	1	NM_002473.6	ENSP00000216181.6	P35579-1
MYH9	ENST00000685801.1 link	c.4941C>T	p.Ile1647Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 35 of 42			ENSP00000510688.1	A0A8I5KWT8
MYH9	ENST00000691109.1 link	n.5173C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 28 of 35
MYH9	ENST00000685708.1 link	n.-95C>T		upstream_gene_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000447

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000622

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000647

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000481

AC:

121

AN:

251416

AF XY:

0.000493

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000260

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000926

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000756

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000744

AC:

1088

AN:

1461828

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000723

AC XY:

526

AN XY:

727218

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000268

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000918

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000325

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

53360

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000860

AC:

956

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000861

AC:

AN:

60394

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.457

Heterozygous variant carriers

128

191

255

319

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000440

AC:

AN:

152286

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000255

AC XY:

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000241

AC:

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15304

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000622

AC:

AN:

4820

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000942

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000647

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.000497

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000521

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:5

Dec 13, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

MYH9: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 03, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:3

Apr 30, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ile1626Ile in Exon 34 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (7/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs143947828). -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 05, 2025

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

MYH9-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

6.3

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.61

PhyloP100

-0.017

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

NM_002473.6:c.4878C>T

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over