rs143947828
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_002473.6(MYH9):c.4878C>T(p.Ile1626Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000716 in 1,614,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00074 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous
NM_002473.6 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0170
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 22-36288306-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36288306-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 178431.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=5, Benign=3}. Variant chr22-36288306-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.017 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00044 (67/152286) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000647 (44/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000495. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 19 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 67 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | NM_002473.6 | c.4878C>T | p.Ile1626Ile | synonymous_variant | 34/41 | ENST00000216181.11 | NP_002464.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH9 | ENST00000216181.11 | c.4878C>T | p.Ile1626Ile | synonymous_variant | 34/41 | 1 | NM_002473.6 | ENSP00000216181.6 | ||
MYH9 | ENST00000685801.1 | c.4941C>T | p.Ile1647Ile | synonymous_variant | 35/42 | ENSP00000510688.1 | ||||
MYH9 | ENST00000691109.1 | n.5173C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 28/35 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000447 AC: 68AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
68
AN:
152168
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000481 AC: 121AN: 251416Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000493 AC XY: 67AN XY: 135880
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
121
AN:
251416
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
67
AN XY:
135880
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000744 AC: 1088AN: 1461828Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000723 AC XY: 526AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1088
AN:
1461828
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
526
AN XY:
727218
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000440 AC: 67AN: 152286Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000255 AC XY: 19AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
67
AN:
152286
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
19
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2023 | MYH9: BP4, BP7 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 04, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 10, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 18, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 30, 2012 | Ile1626Ile in Exon 34 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (7/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs143947828). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at