NM_002700.3:c.668T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points: 10P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_002700.3(POU4F3):c.668T>C(p.Leu223Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002700.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1
This sequence change replaces leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, with proline, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 223 of the POU4F3 protein (p.Leu223Pro). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with autosomal dominant deafness (PMID: 18228599, 19462854; Invitae). It has also been observed to segregate with disease in related individuals. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 7080). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt POU4F3 protein function. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change affects POU4F3 function (PMID: 18228599). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 15 Pathogenic:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at