NM_003919.3:c.606A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_003919.3(SGCE):c.606A>G(p.Thr202Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 1,614,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T202T) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00095 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000077 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

SGCE
NM_003919.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.26

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SGCE (HGNC:10808): (sarcoglycan epsilon) This gene encodes the epsilon member of the sarcoglycan family. Sarcoglycans are transmembrane proteins that are components of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, which link the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix. Unlike other family members which are predominantly expressed in striated muscle, the epsilon sarcoglycan is more broadly expressed. Mutations in this gene are associated with myoclonus-dystonia syndrome. This gene is imprinted, with preferential expression from the paternal allele. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. A pseudogene associated with this gene is located on chromosome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2016]

SGCE links:

CASD1 (HGNC:16014): (CAS1 domain containing 1) Enables N-acetylneuraminate 7-O(or 9-O)-acetyltransferase activity. Involved in carbohydrate metabolic process. Is integral component of Golgi membrane. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

CASD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).

BP6

Variant 7-94618814-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-94618814-T-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 94383.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.26 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000945 (144/152344) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00298 (124/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00255. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 81 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 144 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SGCE	NM_003919.3 link	c.606A>G	p.Thr202Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 11	ENST00000648936.2	NP_003910.1	O43556-1A0A0S2Z4P5

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SGCE	ENST00000648936.2 link	c.606A>G	p.Thr202Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 5 of 11		NM_003919.3	ENSP00000497130.1		O43556-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000946

AC:

144

AN:

152226

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00299

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000981

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000243

AC:

AN:

250964

AF XY:

0.000206

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00295

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000348

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000882

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000773

AC:

113

AN:

1461768

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00224

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000335

AC:

AN:

44716

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39678

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86258

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53408

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5764

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000135

AC:

AN:

1111950

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000132

AC:

AN:

60386

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000945

AC:

144

AN:

152344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00109

AC XY:

AN XY:

74506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00298

AC:

124

AN:

41584

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000980

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2110

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.512

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000664

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00106

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Myoclonic dystonia 11

Benign:2

Jan 19, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Aug 01, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 19, 2016

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

1.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.29

PhyloP100

-1.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=99/1

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over