NM_004006.3:c.7542+13A>G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.7542+13A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00599 in 1,193,378 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. There are 2,304 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0041 ( 1 hom., 119 hem., cov: 21)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0062 ( 27 hom. 2185 hem. )

Consequence

DMD
NM_004006.3 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0150

Variant links:

Genes affected

DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

DMD links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).

BP6

Variant X-31773947-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-31773947-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 94767.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-31773947-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-31773947-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00412 (451/109466) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00808 (81/10022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00666. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 119 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 21. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 119 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DMD	NM_004006.3 link	c.7542+13A>G		intron_variant	Intron 51 of 78	ENST00000357033.9	NP_003997.2	P11532

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DMD	ENST00000357033.9 link	c.7542+13A>G		intron_variant	Intron 51 of 78	1	NM_004006.3	ENSP00000354923.3		A0A075B6G3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00411

AC:

450

AN:

109416

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00376

AC XY:

119

AN XY:

31668

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000698

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00799

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000357

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00637

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00751

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00384

AC:

697

AN:

181738

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00406

AC XY:

271

AN XY:

66762

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00161

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00443

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000527

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000752

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00643

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00469

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00617

AC:

6693

AN:

1083912

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00623

AC XY:

2185

AN XY:

350706

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000880

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00469

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000372

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000742

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00750

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00530

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00412

AC:

451

AN:

109466

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00375

AC XY:

119

AN XY:

31728

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000696

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00808

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000357

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00637

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00742

Alfa

AF:

0.00451

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00461

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:7

Jan 13, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

c.7542+13A>G in intron 51 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it is not located within the conserved splice consensus seq uence. It has been identified in 0.8% (51/6728) of European American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.wa shington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs72466585). -

Mar 12, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: DMD c.7542+13A>G alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 4/4 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0038 in 181738 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote and 271 hemizygotes. The observed variant frequency is at least 348-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype, strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Three ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Feb 13, 2018

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:3

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency

Benign:1

Apr 11, 2018

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;C3668940:Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B

Benign:1

Jul 27, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.87

CADD

Benign

3.5

DANN

Benign

0.62

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over