NM_004360.5:c.2387G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4BP6BS2_Supporting

The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.2387G>A(p.Arg796Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000291 in 1,613,902 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
NM_004360.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.44

Variant links:

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

CDH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.28442767).

BP6

Variant 16-68829745-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-68829745-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142565.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=7}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 7 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5 link	c.2387G>A	p.Arg796Gln	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16	ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1	P12830-1A0A0U2ZQU7B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317184.2 link	c.2204G>A	p.Arg735Gln	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 15		NP_001304113.1	P12830-2B3GN61
CDH1	NM_001317185.2 link	c.839G>A	p.Arg280Gln	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16		NP_001304114.1	P12830B3GN61Q9UII7
CDH1	NM_001317186.2 link	c.422G>A	p.Arg141Gln	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 15		NP_001304115.1	P12830B3GN61

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10 link	c.2387G>A	p.Arg796Gln	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16	1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4		P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000461

AC:

AN:

151916

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000967

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000318

AC:

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000368

AC XY:

AN XY:

135900

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000352

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000274

AC:

AN:

1461868

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000344

AC XY:

AN XY:

727236

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000243

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152034

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74314

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000964

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000113

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

ExAC

AF:

0.0000330

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3

Sep 06, 2023

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28202063, 29295527, 15235021, 22850631, 32283892, 31159747) -

Dec 15, 2023

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The CDH1 c.2387G>A (p.Arg796Gln) variant has been reported in the published literature in at least one reportedly healthy individual and affected individuals in large-scale breast cancer association studies (PMIDs: 30287823 (2018), 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/CDH1)). Additionally, the variant was identified in an individual with unspecified cancer (PMID: 36436516 (2023)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00012 (3/24956 chromosomes in African/African American subpopulation (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Aug 01, 2022

European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN-GENTURIS), i3s - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS2_Supporting (PMID: 30311375) -

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Mar 18, 2021

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Aug 01, 2018

GeneKor MSA

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 02, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CDH1 c.2387G>A (p.Arg796Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of four in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.7e-05 in 403358 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is slightly higher than the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer phenotype (2.8e-05), suggesting that the variant is benign. A recent case-control study showed that this variant was not associated with breast cancer (Dorling_2021). The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 33471991). Nine submitters have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014; they reported the variant with conflicting assessments (Likely Benign n=3, VUS n=6). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.060

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.31

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.44

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.31

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.16

T;T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.76

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.50

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.24

LIST_S2

Benign

0.74

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.035

MetaRNN

Benign

0.28

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.99

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.28

N;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.26

PROVEAN

Benign

2.3

N;.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.19

Sift

Benign

1.0

T;.;T

Sift4G

Benign

1.0

T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0050

B;.;.

Vest4

0.26

MutPred

0.80

Gain of phosphorylation at Y797 (P = 0.0901);.;.;

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.29

ClinPred

0.019

GERP RS

5.0

Varity_R

0.039

gMVP

0.47

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over