NM_005422.4:c.3511G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_005422.4(TECTA):​c.3511G>A​(p.Val1171Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 1,613,716 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

TECTA
NM_005422.4 missense

Scores

6
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.95
Variant links:
Genes affected
TECTA (HGNC:11720): (tectorin alpha) The tectorial membrane is an extracellular matrix of the inner ear that contacts the stereocilia bundles of specialized sensory hair cells. Sound induces movement of these hair cells relative to the tectorial membrane, deflects the stereocilia, and leads to fluctuations in hair-cell membrane potential, transducing sound into electrical signals. Alpha-tectorin is one of the major noncollagenous components of the tectorial membrane. Mutations in the TECTA gene have been shown to be responsible for autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing impairment and a recessive form of sensorineural pre-lingual non-syndromic deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
TBCEL-TECTA (HGNC:54857): (TBCEL-TECTA readthrough) Predicted to enable alpha-tubulin binding activity. Predicted to be involved in microtubule cytoskeleton organization; post-chaperonin tubulin folding pathway; and tubulin complex assembly. Predicted to be active in cytoplasm. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012463182).
BP6
Variant 11-121137990-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-121137990-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 303015.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000158 (24/152346) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00463 (24/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00319. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 9 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TECTANM_005422.4 linkc.3511G>A p.Val1171Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 24 ENST00000392793.6 NP_005413.2 O75443
TBCEL-TECTANM_001378761.1 linkc.4468G>A p.Val1490Met missense_variant Exon 17 of 30 NP_001365690.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TECTAENST00000392793.6 linkc.3511G>A p.Val1171Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 24 5 NM_005422.4 ENSP00000376543.1 O75443
TECTAENST00000264037.2 linkc.3511G>A p.Val1171Met missense_variant Exon 10 of 23 1 ENSP00000264037.2 O75443
TECTAENST00000642222.1 linkc.3511G>A p.Val1171Met missense_variant Exon 11 of 24 ENSP00000493855.1 A0A2R8YDL0
TECTAENST00000645008.1 linkc.817G>A p.Val273Met missense_variant Exon 2 of 15 ENSP00000496274.1 A0A2R8YGQ5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000158
AC:
24
AN:
152228
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00462
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000234
AC:
58
AN:
247956
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000171
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
134302
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00299
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000271
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000248
AC:
363
AN:
1461370
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000237
AC XY:
172
AN XY:
726868
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00875
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000117
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000158
AC:
24
AN:
152346
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74490
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000180
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000151
ExAC
AF:
0.000272
AC:
33
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 12, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Identified in patients with hearing loss in published literature, although specific genotype and phenotype information were not provided for the affected individuals (Miyagawa et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2016); Reported as a non-pathogenic variant without additional details (Yamamoto et al., 2017; Azaiez et al., 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Located in the von Willebrand factor type D3 region of the zonadhesin domain (Hildebrand et al., 2011); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30245029, 28946916, 27610647, 23967202) -

May 17, 2022
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 21 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
Jun 07, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Val1171Met in exon 10 of TECTA: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.4% (33/8586) of East Asian chro mosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.or g; dbSNP rs186780639). -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 12 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.42
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.42
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.027
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.012
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.69
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.;M
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.57
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.080
N;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.20
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.093
T;.;T
Polyphen
0.97
D;.;D
Vest4
0.30
MVP
0.82
MPC
0.89
ClinPred
0.16
T
GERP RS
4.6
Varity_R
0.079
gMVP
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186780639; hg19: chr11-121008699; COSMIC: COSV50703487; COSMIC: COSV50703487; API