NM_006231.4:c.861T>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.861T>A​(p.Asp287Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D287H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 missense

Scores

4
7
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:7B:12O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.19

Publications

15 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
POLE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
  • IMAGe syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.044186294).
BP6
Variant 12-132676594-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132676594-A-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 221000.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152294) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00215 (146/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00186. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 85 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkc.861T>A p.Asp287Glu missense_variant Exon 9 of 49 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2 Q07864

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkc.861T>A p.Asp287Glu missense_variant Exon 9 of 49 1 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570.5 Q07864

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152176
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000859
AC:
216
AN:
251450
AF XY:
0.000758
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000814
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00137
AC:
1999
AN:
1461786
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00130
AC XY:
942
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000671
AC:
3
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000232
AC:
2
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000749
AC:
4
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00174
AC:
1932
AN:
1111924
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000795
AC:
48
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
96
191
287
382
478
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
72
144
216
288
360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152294
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000289
AC:
12
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000916
AC:
14
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00215
AC:
146
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00189
AC:
4
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
20
31
41
51
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00177
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00111
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.000865
AC:
105
EpiCase
AF:
0.00147
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:7Benign:12Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

POLE: BS1 -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Aug 21, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26648449, 30374176, 30680046, 30971823, 30414346, 29454559, 29120461, 29185122, 28873162, 27720647, 27153395, 25224212, 26251183) -

Jan 31, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:2Benign:2Other:1
Feb 07, 2025
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -

-
GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 12-21-2015 by Lab Ambry. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Aug 13, 2015
Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 05, 2016
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -

Mar 28, 2018
University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

The POLE variant designated as NM_006231.2:c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) is classified as likely benign. This variant has been reported at a frequency of over 1 in 400 individuals in individuals with European non-Finnish ancestry (exac.broadinstitute.org). Variants present at this population frequency are unlikely to be associated with high penetrance hereditary cancer risk. Cosegregation analysis of one observed family was performed and shows a likelihood ratio of pathogenicity of 0.98 to 1 (Thompson, et al., 2003, PMID:2900794). Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID: 29300386) gives less than 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter POLE function or modify cancer risk. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. -

not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Dec 04, 2018
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: POLE c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA-directed DNA polymerase, family B, exonuclease domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00083 in 277192 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 120-folds higher then the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.861T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cutaneous malignant melanoma, endometrial cancer and Lynch Syndrome (Aoude_2015, Billingsley_2015, Jansen_2016, Potjer_2018). Two families published by Auode_2015 indicate the variant did not segregate with disease, along with Jansen_2016 reporting a patient with the variant of interest, who had two MLH1 pathogenic somatic variants, c.208-1G>A and c.440_447del. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eleven ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) predominantly cite the variant as uncertain significance, while two cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Apr 20, 2020
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

DNA sequence analysis of the POLE gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.861T>A, in exon 9 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asp287Glu. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.18% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs139075637). The p.Asp287Glu change has been reported in one suspected Lynch syndrome patient (PMID: 26648449) and nine melanoma patients (PMID: 30414346). This sequence change has also been reported in three families with cutaneous malignant melanoma; however, incomplete segregation with disease was observed (PMID: 26251183). The p.Asp287Glu change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the POLE protein that is known to be functional. The p.Asp287Glu substitution appears to be deleterious using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Asp287Glu change remains unknown at this time. -

Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Sep 26, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Feb 04, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Feb 01, 2018
True Health Diagnostics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer Uncertain:1
Oct 01, 2016
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Found in patient having exome sequencing due to suspicion for hereditary colon cancer and/or polyps. Patient is a 32 year old male with gastric cancer, bladder cancer and colon polyps. Family history of gastric cancer and colon polyps. Patient also has a pathogenic variant in CDH1. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. -

POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Aug 02, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Jan 23, 2024
Mendelics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12;C3554576:Facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome;C5193036:Intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency Benign:1
Jan 08, 2025
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.71
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.010
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.19
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.045
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.044
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.68
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M;.
PhyloP100
1.2
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.81
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.29
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.65
MutPred
0.37
Gain of catalytic residue at Q292 (P = 0);.;
MVP
0.37
MPC
0.75
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
1.9
Varity_R
0.53
gMVP
0.62
Mutation Taster
=28/72
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139075637; hg19: chr12-133253180; COSMIC: COSV57691380; COSMIC: COSV57691380; API