rs139075637
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.861T>A(p.Asp287Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 missense
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
4
7
8
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.19
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.044186294).
BP6
Variant 12-132676594-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132676594-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 221000.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=6, not_provided=2, Benign=3}. Variant chr12-132676594-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152294) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00215 (146/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00186. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.861T>A | p.Asp287Glu | missense_variant | 9/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.861T>A | p.Asp287Glu | missense_variant | 9/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152176Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
176
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000859 AC: 216AN: 251450Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000758 AC XY: 103AN XY: 135908
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
216
AN:
251450
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
135908
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00137 AC: 1999AN: 1461786Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00130 AC XY: 942AN XY: 727194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1999
AN:
1461786
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
942
AN XY:
727194
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152294Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00114 AC XY: 85AN XY: 74472
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
176
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74472
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
AC:
105
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:10Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | POLE: BS1 - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect, ClinGen | - | GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 21, 2020 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26648449, 30374176, 30680046, 30971823, 30414346, 29454559, 29120461, 29185122, 28873162, 27720647, 27153395, 25224212, 26251183) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jan 31, 2023 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:3Benign:1Other:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Apr 19, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
not provided, no classification provided | phenotyping only | GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network | - | Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 12-21-2015 by Lab Ambry. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington | Mar 28, 2018 | The POLE variant designated as NM_006231.2:c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) is classified as likely benign. This variant has been reported at a frequency of over 1 in 400 individuals in individuals with European non-Finnish ancestry (exac.broadinstitute.org). Variants present at this population frequency are unlikely to be associated with high penetrance hereditary cancer risk. Cosegregation analysis of one observed family was performed and shows a likelihood ratio of pathogenicity of 0.98 to 1 (Thompson, et al., 2003, PMID:2900794). Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID: 29300386) gives less than 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter POLE function or modify cancer risk. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Jul 05, 2016 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences University | Aug 13, 2015 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 04, 2018 | Variant summary: POLE c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA-directed DNA polymerase, family B, exonuclease domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00083 in 277192 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 120-folds higher then the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.861T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cutaneous malignant melanoma, endometrial cancer and Lynch Syndrome (Aoude_2015, Billingsley_2015, Jansen_2016, Potjer_2018). Two families published by Auode_2015 indicate the variant did not segregate with disease, along with Jansen_2016 reporting a patient with the variant of interest, who had two MLH1 pathogenic somatic variants, c.208-1G>A and c.440_447del. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eleven ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) predominantly cite the variant as uncertain significance, while two cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 20, 2020 | DNA sequence analysis of the POLE gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.861T>A, in exon 9 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asp287Glu. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.18% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs139075637). The p.Asp287Glu change has been reported in one suspected Lynch syndrome patient (PMID: 26648449) and nine melanoma patients (PMID: 30414346). This sequence change has also been reported in three families with cutaneous malignant melanoma; however, incomplete segregation with disease was observed (PMID: 26251183). The p.Asp287Glu change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the POLE protein that is known to be functional. The p.Asp287Glu substitution appears to be deleterious using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Asp287Glu change remains unknown at this time. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 26, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Feb 01, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 04, 2021 | - - |
Colorectal cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Oct 01, 2016 | Found in patient having exome sequencing due to suspicion for hereditary colon cancer and/or polyps. Patient is a 32 year old male with gastric cancer, bladder cancer and colon polyps. Family history of gastric cancer and colon polyps. Patient also has a pathogenic variant in CDH1. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. - |
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 02, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | Jan 23, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;D
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Polyphen
D;D
Vest4
MutPred
Gain of catalytic residue at Q292 (P = 0);.;
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at