rs139075637

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The ENST00000320574.10(POLE):​c.861T>A​(p.Asp287Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00135 in 1,614,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D287H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
ENST00000320574.10 missense

Scores

4
7
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:10O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.19
Variant links:
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.044186294).
BP6
Variant 12-132676594-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132676594-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 221000.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=6, Likely_benign=6, not_provided=2}. Variant chr12-132676594-A-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00116 (176/152294) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00215 (146/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00186. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 85 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
POLENM_006231.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.861T>A p.Asp287Glu missense_variant 9/49 ENST00000320574.10 NP_006222.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
POLEENST00000320574.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.861T>A p.Asp287Glu missense_variant 9/491 NM_006231.4 ENSP00000322570 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152176
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000917
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000859
AC:
216
AN:
251450
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000758
AC XY:
103
AN XY:
135908
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00179
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000814
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00137
AC:
1999
AN:
1461786
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00130
AC XY:
942
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000671
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000749
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00174
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000795
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
176
AN:
152294
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00177
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00111
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00182
AC:
7
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.000865
AC:
105
EpiCase
AF:
0.00147
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:10Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 21, 2020This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26648449, 30374176, 30680046, 30971823, 30414346, 29454559, 29120461, 29185122, 28873162, 27720647, 27153395, 25224212, 26251183) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024POLE: BS1 -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect, ClinGen-GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU DresdenNov 03, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJan 31, 2023- -
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Uncertain:3Benign:1Other:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 28, 2018The POLE variant designated as NM_006231.2:c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) is classified as likely benign. This variant has been reported at a frequency of over 1 in 400 individuals in individuals with European non-Finnish ancestry (exac.broadinstitute.org). Variants present at this population frequency are unlikely to be associated with high penetrance hereditary cancer risk. Cosegregation analysis of one observed family was performed and shows a likelihood ratio of pathogenicity of 0.98 to 1 (Thompson, et al., 2003, PMID:2900794). Bayesian analysis integrating all of this data (Tavtigian et al, 2018, PMID: 29300386) gives less than 1% probability of pathogenicity, which is consistent with a classification of likely benign. This variant is not predicted to alter POLE function or modify cancer risk. This analysis was performed in conjunction with the family studies project as part of the University of Washington Find My Variant Study. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylJul 05, 2016- -
not provided, no classification providedphenotyping onlyGenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network-Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 12-21-2015 by Lab Ambry. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingKnight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health and Sciences UniversityAug 13, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Apr 19, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
not specified Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 20, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the POLE gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.861T>A, in exon 9 that results in an amino acid change, p.Asp287Glu. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.18% in the European sub-population (dbSNP rs139075637). The p.Asp287Glu change has been reported in one suspected Lynch syndrome patient (PMID: 26648449) and nine melanoma patients (PMID: 30414346). This sequence change has also been reported in three families with cutaneous malignant melanoma; however, incomplete segregation with disease was observed (PMID: 26251183). The p.Asp287Glu change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the POLE protein that is known to be functional. The p.Asp287Glu substitution appears to be deleterious using several in-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL). Due to these contrasting evidences and the lack of functional studies, the clinical significance of the p.Asp287Glu change remains unknown at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University HospitalJul 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 04, 2018Variant summary: POLE c.861T>A (p.Asp287Glu) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the DNA-directed DNA polymerase, family B, exonuclease domain of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00083 in 277192 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 120-folds higher then the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.861T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cutaneous malignant melanoma, endometrial cancer and Lynch Syndrome (Aoude_2015, Billingsley_2015, Jansen_2016, Potjer_2018). Two families published by Auode_2015 indicate the variant did not segregate with disease, along with Jansen_2016 reporting a patient with the variant of interest, who had two MLH1 pathogenic somatic variants, c.208-1G>A and c.440_447del. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eleven ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) predominantly cite the variant as uncertain significance, while two cite the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 26, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsFeb 01, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 04, 2021- -
Colorectal cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCSER _CC_NCGL, University of WashingtonOct 01, 2016Found in patient having exome sequencing due to suspicion for hereditary colon cancer and/or polyps. Patient is a 32 year old male with gastric cancer, bladder cancer and colon polyps. Family history of gastric cancer and colon polyps. Patient also has a pathogenic variant in CDH1. This interpretation considers GERP score and allele frequency data, in addition to published reports of the variant in the literature, available at the time of review. -
POLE-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 02, 2024This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsJan 23, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.71
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.010
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.37
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.19
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.13
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.045
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.044
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.68
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
2.9
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.81
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.4
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.29
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0040
D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D
Vest4
0.65
MutPred
0.37
Gain of catalytic residue at Q292 (P = 0);.;
MVP
0.37
MPC
0.75
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
1.9
Varity_R
0.53
gMVP
0.62

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139075637; hg19: chr12-133253180; COSMIC: COSV57691380; COSMIC: COSV57691380; API