NM_006397.3:c.36C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 4P and 5B. PM2PP3_ModerateBP6BS1

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):c.36C>T(p.Gly12Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000624 in 1,569,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0690

Variant links:

Genes affected

RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

RNASEH2A links:

THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)

THSD8 links:

HOOK2 (HGNC:19885): (hook microtubule tethering protein 2) Hook proteins are cytosolic coiled-coil proteins that contain conserved N-terminal domains, which attach to microtubules, and more divergent C-terminal domains, which mediate binding to organelles. The Drosophila Hook protein is a component of the endocytic compartment.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2004]

HOOK2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP3

Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.

BP6

Variant 19-12806709-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12806709-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 532919.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-12806709-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000571 (81/1417560) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.000867 (70/80756). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000704. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 60 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RNASEH2A	NM_006397.3 link	c.36C>T	p.Gly12Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 8	ENST00000221486.6	NP_006388.2	O75792

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RNASEH2A	ENST00000221486.6 link	c.36C>T	p.Gly12Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 8	1	NM_006397.3	ENSP00000221486.4		O75792

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000141

AC:

AN:

177630

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000211

AC XY:

AN XY:

94928

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000289

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000827

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000271

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000571

AC:

AN:

1417560

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000856

AC XY:

AN XY:

701094

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000245

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000867

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000184

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000170

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000108

AC XY:

AN XY:

74384

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000965

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000117

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Dec 16, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.40

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.2

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.85

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_DG_spliceai

0.85

Position offset: -2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over