chr19-12806709-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM2PP3_ModerateBP6

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):​c.36C>T​(p.Gly12=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000624 in 1,569,796 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0690
Variant links:
Genes affected
RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]
THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)
HOOK2 (HGNC:19885): (hook microtubule tethering protein 2) Hook proteins are cytosolic coiled-coil proteins that contain conserved N-terminal domains, which attach to microtubules, and more divergent C-terminal domains, which mediate binding to organelles. The Drosophila Hook protein is a component of the endocytic compartment.[supplied by OMIM, Apr 2004]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
Splicing scoreres supports a deletorius effect: Scorers claiming Pathogenic: max_spliceai. No scorers claiming Uncertain. No scorers claiming Benign.
BP6
Variant 19-12806709-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12806709-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 532919.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-12806709-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RNASEH2ANM_006397.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Gly12= synonymous_variant 1/8 ENST00000221486.6 NP_006388.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RNASEH2AENST00000221486.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.36C>T p.Gly12= synonymous_variant 1/81 NM_006397.3 ENSP00000221486 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000141
AC:
25
AN:
177630
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000211
AC XY:
20
AN XY:
94928
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000271
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000571
AC:
81
AN:
1417560
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000856
AC XY:
60
AN XY:
701094
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000245
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000867
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000184
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000170
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000112
AC:
17
AN:
152236
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000108
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000362
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000965
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000117

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 22, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Benign
0.93
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.85
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
DS_DG_spliceai
0.85
Position offset: -2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs375139492; hg19: chr19-12917523; API