NM_007194.4:c.1510G>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):​c.1510G>C​(p.Glu504Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000144 in 1,595,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.37
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.053901017).
BP6
Variant 22-28689167-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-28689167-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142479.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=8}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkc.1510G>C p.Glu504Gln missense_variant Exon 14 of 15 ENST00000404276.6 NP_009125.1 O96017-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkc.1510G>C p.Glu504Gln missense_variant Exon 14 of 15 1 NM_007194.4 ENSP00000385747.1 O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000428
AC:
10
AN:
233634
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000468
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
128330
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000104
AC:
15
AN:
1443070
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0000125
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
718374
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000246
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000666
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Bravo
AF:
0.000125
ExAC
AF:
0.0000348
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Nov 12, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Jan 30, 2023
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The p.E504Q variant (also known as c.1510G>C), located in coding exon 13 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 1510. The glutamic acid at codon 504 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This alteration was detected in 0/1054 Hispanic BRCA1/2-negative probands with hereditary breast cancer and 2/1189 controls (Weitzel JN et al. Cancer, 2019 Aug;125:2829-2836). This alteration behaved as functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum Mutat, 2019 05;40:631-648). This amino acid position is poorly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Mar 29, 2016
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:2Benign:1
Mar 08, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -

Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 504 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Glu504Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs587782489, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or colorectal cancer (PMID: 28577310, 35957908). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 142479). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change does not substantially affect CHEK2 function (PMID: 28577310). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Jan 20, 2017
Counsyl
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Uncertain:2
Oct 03, 2024
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

The CHEK2 c.1510G>C (p.Glu504Gln) variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with a Lynch Syndrome-like phenotype (28577310 (2017)) and an individual undergoing hereditary cancer panel testing (PMID: 25318351 (2014)). It has also been observed in reportedly healthy individuals (PMID: 31206626 (2019)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.00026 (9/35206 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -

May 20, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Published functional studies demonstrate no damaging effect: cell growth and proliferation after DNA damage similar to wild type (PMID: 30851065); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); Observed in individuals with colorectal or breast cancer and also in unaffected controls (PMID: 28577310, 31206626, 33471991, 35957908); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25318351, 24356096, 33471991, 31206626, 28577310, 30851065, 35957908) -

not specified Uncertain:1
Feb 13, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1510G>C (p.Glu504Gln) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.3e-05 in 233634 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00026 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1510G>C has been reported in the literature in an individual with MSH2-deficient colorectal cancer in whom a germline MSH2 alteration was not reportedly identified (example, Vargas-Parra_2017), as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing in an individual tested for an unspecified hereditary cancer (example, Yorczyk_2015) and as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing in an individual with BRCA-negative breast cancer (example, Weitzel_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function (Delimitsou_2019). These results showed no damaging effect of this variant in a yeast-based in-vitro assay. Eight clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation (VUS, n=7; likely benign, n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C5882668:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer Benign:1
Sep 11, 2024
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following: it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease, and/or has normal protein function, and/or has lack of segregation with disease, and/or has been detected in co-occurrence with known pathogenic variant, and/or has lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or is located in a region inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.57
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.80
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.87
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.043
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.81
.;T;.;T;.;T;T;T;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.019
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.054
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;.;N;.;N;.;N;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.33
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.84
N;N;N;.;N;N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.046
Sift
Benign
0.37
T;T;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.48
T;T;T;.;T;T;.;T;T
Polyphen
0.016
B;B;B;.;B;B;B;B;B
Vest4
0.11
MutPred
0.15
Gain of helix (P = 0.062);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.062);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.062);.;Gain of helix (P = 0.062);.;.;
MVP
0.69
MPC
0.020
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
0.86
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587782489; hg19: chr22-29085155; API