NM_007294.4:c.2428A>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4BP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.2428A>T(p.Asn810Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000117 in 1,613,522 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000679 AC: 17AN: 250534Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000517 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135410
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000122 AC: 179AN: 1461354Hom.: 0 Cov.: 41 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 86AN XY: 726970
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000657 AC: 10AN: 152168Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74332
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:4
IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000000000000233 -
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:4
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
- -
- -
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
The BRCA1 p.Asn810Tyr variant was identified in 1 of 200 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Peixoto 2006,). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs28897682) as “with benign allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, Ambry Genetics, Color and 4 other submitters; as likely benign by Counsyl; and as uncertain significance by BIC), LOVD 3.0 (observed 15x) and UMD-LSDB (observed 19x). The variant was identified in control databases in 17 of 245,294 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 5 of 33,562 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), European in 12 of 111,138 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The variant was observed in trans with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3748 G>T, p.Glu1250*; Judkins 2005). Additionally, the variant was reported in the UMD-LSDB database as co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.2359dup, p.Glu787Glyfs*3). In a complementation assay in BRCA1-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, the variant was demonstrated to have no observed effect on cell proliferation and sensitivity to cisplatin indicating the variant protein activity was sufficient to complement the BRCA1 null cells (Bouwman 2013). The p.Asn810 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at