NM_014780.5:c.4762C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_014780.5(CUL7):c.4762C>A(p.Leu1588Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00853 in 1,614,146 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014780.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00707 AC: 1076AN: 152172Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00793 AC: 1987AN: 250700Hom.: 15 AF XY: 0.00773 AC XY: 1047AN XY: 135512
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00868 AC: 12691AN: 1461856Hom.: 64 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00858 AC XY: 6239AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00707 AC: 1076AN: 152290Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00725 AC XY: 540AN XY: 74460
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
- -
- -
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function -
CUL7: PM5, BS2 -
not specified Benign:1
- -
3M syndrome 1 Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at