NM_016579.4:c.23A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_016579.4(CD320):c.23A>G(p.Gln8Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0656 in 1,582,434 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9,897 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016579.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic acidemia due to transcobalamin receptor defectInheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.153 AC: 23211AN: 152044Hom.: 3903 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0825 AC: 16026AN: 194160 AF XY: 0.0843 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0563 AC: 80467AN: 1430272Hom.: 5973 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0589 AC XY: 41862AN XY: 710656 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.153 AC: 23274AN: 152162Hom.: 3924 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.154 AC XY: 11428AN XY: 74394 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Methylmalonic acidemia due to transcobalamin receptor defect Benign:1
- -
not provided Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at